🔗 Share this article

Itranspired he could survive a loss to lower-league opposition. Survive a decisive continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, squandering the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated his squad for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this whole painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. It may have been easy, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to view him as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among football's true generals: a strategic mind of which the club's mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Clash Regarding System & Philosophy

To illustrate, this was the director , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when delivered by a man of a man the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – function on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Authority In Command

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he announced that the team's approach of play “will be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his background in industry and sailing. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are superior: more insightful, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply better. Who else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

The New Soccer Order: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to join a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to invest the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to decide the strategy in the boardroom and hire a coach who will adapt their methods accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more like delivery personnel: not responsible for the food, yet finally accountable if it arrives poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while the people who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Football: Accountability for the Few

And possibly in a small way this represents neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then fire them for using too much 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and later discard him for requiring too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.