Russia Seeks Substantial Amount in Compensation from Clearing House over Seized Assets

The Russian central bank has stated it is seeking compensation totaling $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This action represents a clear response from the Kremlin against plans to use immobilized Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

According to accounts in Russian state media, the central bank filed a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

EU leaders will decide later this week regarding a plan to use around €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its military and economic needs.

The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the main keeper for the Russian frozen financial reserves.

Dispute on Ownership

European Union officials have argued that their plan is legally sound. They argue is based on the principle that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, even though it was immobilized in European jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened reciprocal actions, including seizing EU corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a key position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

In comments seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system created by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. It has in the past noted it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

Although judges in EU countries are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, if relevant holdings can be identified," stated a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are working on steps to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European entities. Additionally, they are designing safeguards to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

Under the complex plan, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would remain unaffected.

Kyiv would solely be obligated to repay the loan if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast damage caused during the ongoing war.

Other Funding Ideas

Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an different method for funding Ukraine. This involves joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, however, requires full agreement among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear message that if you cause all this destruction to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."
Michelle Howard
Michelle Howard

A passionate blogger and digital marketing expert sharing insights to help others succeed online.