🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an international accord designed to protect females from abuse, covering family violence, following extensive and heated debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final authority now rests with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to establish legal frameworks and support services to end all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to initiate the procedure of exiting from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet conservative factions have contended that its emphasis on gender equality weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action proposed by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the primary political groups advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose head has called on the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the treaty not to be made political, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent vote has sparked widespread outcry both within Latvia and internationally.

22,000 individuals have signed a Latvian petition demanding the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a rash choice driven by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the convention in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority majority, the president could potentially send back the bill for additional consideration if he has concerns.

President Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account state and legal factors, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but across the continent," commented a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse rates have been rising in multiple EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could influence comparable discussions in other EU countries