🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.